Why is graffiti a problem

We are now witnessing a radicalization of practices both from two points of view: legality and vandalism. The character of these acts explains why some artists not only from the graffiti scene have seen their career highlighted with arrests, penalties and sometimes trials, while their works are copyrightable Moyne, This is even truer for legal graffiti, mainly because of the variability of quality of the known and the good quality of spray paints, supposedly meant to last, as opposed to, the use of cheap brands of spray paint as illegal graffiti Marsh, It focusses on a comparison study, mainly through artist interviews, between the evolving graffiti practices in Western major cities where illegality is often reclaimed by artists, and the fast emergence of graffiti in China, where this artistic expression is not only watched through its illegal and vandalism forms, but also for its aesthetic perceptions, though practices happen in restricted areas for expressing social, anti-official and political actions Valjakka, If they cannot scrap it out, they paint over and that is why graffiti never lasts.

At the same time, the relationship with authorities has improved very much over the last few years. It is more and more common to negotiate with the police by explaining what graffiti writers are doing, colours and mode of expression for everybody, in order to, embellish the streets rather than litter or vandalize them. Confronting these two almost opposite approaches, it allows a better understanding of this artistic form, as to whether it is considered vandalism or art.

Contemporary art scientist. Site map — Syndication. Privacy Policy — About Cookies. Skip to navigation — Site map. Contents - Previous document - Next document. Vandalism and Art. Alain Colombini. Outline Text References About the author. Therefore, the perception of lawlessness that graffiti fosters eventually evolves into literal lawlessness. Communities need to rid their parks of graffiti if they want to enjoy the numerous and lucrative benefits that the parks bring.

The problem is that parks are incredibly difficult to police. Parks can be large with many nooks and crannies for criminals to operate in, not to mention that most parks lack walls or fences. Neither police nor park rangers can adequately patrol parks to prevent graffiti vandals from committing their crimes. Only with the aid of graffiti cameras, can parks obtain the level of surveillance necessary to ward off and capture graffiti vandals. Vandals have no chance against graffiti cameras.

Graffiti is a controversial matter, especially in the United States. Many people see graffiti as a culturally significant artform that brings vibrancy to communities. Others see graffiti as a stain on what would otherwise be pristine and respectable communities. Interestingly, the term graffiti is an Italian word.

The style of graffiti we are familiar with today began in New York in the late s, being heavily influenced by hip-hop culture. Contemporary graffiti began with the underlying desire for artists to have their work seen by as many people as possible by tagging popular buildings and trains.

This dream was made possible with the invention of the aerosol spray can, so that no subway car or freight train was safe from graffiti. Most graffiti is crude and sloppy. Both patrons and employees feel threatened by the presence of graffiti near the workplace, which can seriously hamper the success of a business.

Graffiti must be stopped. The most effective way to stop graffiti from occurring is by installing anti-graffiti cameras, specially designed to deter this unwanted criminal activity. Affected areas may also start to feel run down and appear threatening, putting off customers and prospects. Some graffiti can be very offensive, threatening to groups or individuals, or racially abusive. Local authorities are not responsible for clearing graffiti on private property, which includes business premises but will work with the community to prevent graffiti wherever they can.

There is public debate over whether graffiti should be considered art or crime. Research shows that people make a distinction between vandalism and community projects or genuine street art, best known through Banksy. Although the public profess a liking for urban art, it is worth pointing out that actual examples are very rarely encountered by those surveying the state of cleanliness in England.

First impressions count and an unsightly building could lead to a loss of business or a reduction in staff morale. Eliminating graffiti as soon as it appears makes it easier to remove and reduces the risk of vandals doing it again. This will show that the provider adheres to professional standards, compatible with loss adjuster and insurer processes. Registration is free, so that if an unexpected emergency occurs then help can be quickly provided.